External validation of the 2017 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathies in a Mexican cohort: Role of autoantibodies in the diagnosis and classification of patients with inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to perform the first external validation of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathy (IIM) in a Mexican dynamic cohort where the patients were evaluated with clinical and laboratory values. As secondary objectives, we presented the clinical characteristics of the patients and included antibodies other than anti Jo1 to evaluate their impact on our population. METHODOLOGY: This study included 70 patients with IIM and 70 patients with differential diagnoses of IIM, according to the absolute score of the classification criteria. We obtained sensitivity and specificity in the modality without biopsy, and as an exploratory analysis, we added other antibodies from the myositis extended panel. We analyzed the area under the curve (AUC) of three models: score without antibodies, with anti Jo1 and with any antibody. RESULTS: The ACR/EULAR criteria showed increased specificity and at least similar sensitivity to that of the original cohort (85% sensitivity and 92% specificity), with a cohort point of >55%. When we classified patients into definite, probable, possible, and no IIM categories, by adding the extended myopathy panel, 6 of the 10 patients initially classified as "no IIM" changed their classification to "Probable IIM" and 4 to "Definite IIM"; of the 16 patients classified as "probable IIM," 15 changed their classification to "Definite IIM." CONCLUSION: Considering the limitations of this study, we concluded that the 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for IIM classification are sensitive and specific for classifying patients with IIM in the Mexican population. Additionally, the addition of antibodies other than anti-Jo1 may improve performance in certain populations.

External validation of the 2017 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathies in a Mexican cohort: Role of autoantibodies in the diagnosis and classification of patients with inflammatory myopathies / Validación externa de los criterios de clasificación de la ACR/EULAR de 2017 para miopatías inflamatorias en una cohorte mexicana. Papel de los anticuerpos en el diagnóstico y la clasificación de pacientes con miopatías inflamatorias

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to perform the first external validation of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathy (IIM) in a Mexican dynamic cohort where the patients were evaluated with clinical and laboratory values. As secondary objectives, we presented the clinical characteristics of the patients and included antibodies other than anti Jo1 to evaluate their impact on our population. Methodology: This study included 70 patients with IIM and 70 patients with differential diagnoses of IIM, according to the absolute score of the classification criteria. We obtained sensitivity and specificity in the modality without biopsy, and as an exploratory analysis, we added other antibodies from the myositis extended panel. We analyzed the area under the curve (AUC) of three models: score without antibodies, with anti Jo1 and with any antibody. Results: The ACR/EULAR criteria showed increased specificity and at least similar sensitivity to that of the original cohort (85% sensitivity and 92% specificity), with a cohort point of >55%. When we classified patients into definite, probable, possible, and no IIM categories, by adding the extended myopathy panel, 6 of the 10 patients initially classified as “no IIM” changed their classification to “Probable IIM” and 4 to “Definite IIM”; of the 16 patients classified as “probable IIM,” 15 changed their classification to “Definite IIM.” Conclusion: Considering the limitations of this study, we concluded that the 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for IIM classification are sensitive and specific for classifying patients with IIM in the Mexican population. Additionally, the addition of antibodies other than anti-Jo1 may improve performance in certain populations.(AU)

Objetivo: Este estudio retrospectivo tuvo como objetivo realizar la primera validación externa de los criterios de clasificación ACR/EULAR para miopatía inflamatoria (MII) en una cohorte dinámica de pacientes mexicanos que fueron evaluados en consulta y con muestras de laboratorio. Como objetivos secundarios presentamos las características clínicas de los pacientes e incluimos anticuerpos distintos al anti-Jo1 para evaluar su impacto en nuestra población. Metodología: Este estudio incluyó a 70 pacientes con MII y 70 pacientes con diagnóstico diferencial de MII, según la puntuación absoluta de los criterios de clasificación. Obtuvimos la sensibilidad y la especificidad en la modalidad sin biopsia, y como análisis exploratorio añadimos otros anticuerpos del panel extendido de miositis. Analizamos el área bajo la curva (AUC) de tres modelos: puntuación sin anticuerpos, con anti-Jo1 y con cualquier otro anticuerpo. Resultados: Los criterios ACR/EULAR mostraron una mayor especificidad y una sensibilidad, al menos similar a la de la cohorte original (85% de sensibilidad y 92% de especificidad), con un punto de cohorte de >55%. Cuando clasificamos a los pacientes en las categorías de definitiva, probable, posible y sin MII, al agregar el panel ampliado de miopatía, 6 de los 10 pacientes clasificados inicialmente como «Sin MII» cambiaron su clasificación a «Probable MII» y 4 a «MII Definitiva»; de los 16 pacientes clasificados como «Probable MII», 15 cambiaron su clasificación a «MII Definitiva». Conclusión: Considerando las limitaciones de este estudio, concluimos que los criterios de 2017 de la EULAR/ACR para la clasificación de la MII son sensibles y específicos para clasificar a los pacientes con MII en la población mexicana. Además, la adición de anticuerpos que no sean anti-Jo1 puede mejorar la estadificación en ciertas poblaciones.(AU)

Clinical features of patients with hands arthralgia referred from primary care physicians to rheumatologists: A cohort study / Características clínicas de los pacientes con artralgia de manos que son referidos a la clínica de reumatología por médicos de atención primaria: un estudio de cohorte

Purpose: Early referral of patients with suspicious of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has an impact on prognosis. Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with hands arthralgia who were referred from primary care physicians (PCP) to the rheumatologist.Methods: A descriptive, observational, prospective cohort study was performed. We included patients who visited a PCP for the first time for hands arthralgia. Demographics and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for arthralgia suspicious for progression to RA plus seven complementary questions, the time to referral, the pressure needed to provoke pain with an automatic squeeze test machine in the metacarpophalangeal joints of both hands, and the diagnoses established at the last review of medical charts from patients on follow-up were documented. The primary outcome was the referral to a rheumatologist. Results: A total of 109 patients were included. The mean age was 49.9 years, 81.6% were women. 30.3% were referred to the rheumatologist. The time to referral was a median of 38 days. The main clinical characteristics associated with referral to the rheumatologist were the “most severe symptoms are present after midnight” (OR=6.29) and the “difficulty with making a fist” (OR=3.67). An isolated “positive squeeze test of metacarpophalangeal joints” was not associated with a referral to the rheumatologist. Conclusions: Among patients with hands arthralgia who attended PCP, those with most severe symptoms after midnight and difficulty making a fist were more likely to be referred to the rheumatology clinic. Isolated positive squeeze tests are not a parameter for referral, it should only be performed if arthralgia is clinically suspected.(AU)

Objetivo: Derivar tempranamente a los pacientes con sospecha de artritis reumatoide (AR) tiene un impacto en su pronóstico. Nuestro estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar las características clínicas de los pacientes con artralgia de manos que fueron remitidos desde médicos de atención primaria (MAP) al reumatólogo. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte descriptivo, observacional, y prospectivo. Incluimos pacientes que acudieron con un MAP por artralgia de manos. Se documentaron criterios demográficos y de la European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) para artralgia con sospecha de progresión a AR más siete preguntas complementarias, el tiempo de derivación, la presión necesaria para provocar dolor con una máquina automática que comprime las articulaciones metacarpofalángicas, y los diagnósticos establecidos en la última revisión documentados en los expedientes médicos de los pacientes en seguimiento. El resultado principal fue la referencia al reumatólogo. Resultados: Un total de 109 pacientes fueron incluidos. El promedio de edad fue de 49,9 años, 81,6% fueron mujeres, 30,3% fueron referidos al reumatólogo. El tiempo de derivación al reumatólogo tuvo una mediana de 38 días. Las principales características clínicas asociadas con lo anterior fueron: «síntomas más severos presentes después de la medianoche» (OR=6,29) y «dificultad para hacer un puño» (OR=3,67). Una «prueba de compresión positiva de las articulaciones metacarpofalángicas» aislada no se asoció con una derivación al reumatólogo. Conclusión: Entre los pacientes que acudieron con MAP por artralgia de manos, aquellos con síntomas más severos después de la medianoche y que refirieron dificultad para realizar un puño fueron más frecuentemente referidos a una clínica de reumatología. Sin embargo, una prueba de compresión aislada no fue útil para la derivación temprana.(AU)

Clinical features of patients with hands arthralgia referred from primary care physicians to rheumatologists: A cohort study.

PURPOSE: Early referral of patients with suspicious of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has an impact on prognosis. Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with hands arthralgia who were referred from primary care physicians (PCP) to the rheumatologist. METHODS: A descriptive, observational, prospective cohort study was performed. We included patients who visited a PCP for the first time for hands arthralgia. Demographics and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for arthralgia suspicious for progression to RA plus seven complementary questions, the time to referral, the pressure needed to provoke pain with an automatic squeeze test machine in the metacarpophalangeal joints of both hands, and the diagnoses established at the last review of medical charts from patients on follow-up were documented. The primary outcome was the referral to a rheumatologist. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included. The mean age was 49.9 years, 81.6% were women. 30.3% were referred to the rheumatologist. The time to referral was a median of 38 days. The main clinical characteristics associated with referral to the rheumatologist were the "most severe symptoms are present after midnight" (OR=6.29) and the "difficulty with making a fist" (OR=3.67). An isolated "positive squeeze test of metacarpophalangeal joints" was not associated with a referral to the rheumatologist. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with hands arthralgia who attended PCP, those with most severe symptoms after midnight and difficulty making a fist were more likely to be referred to the rheumatology clinic. Isolated positive squeeze tests are not a parameter for referral, it should only be performed if arthralgia is clinically suspected.

Comparison of Two Strategies for Hypercholesterolemia Detection through Point-of-Care Testing.

BACKGROUND: Childhood dyslipidemia is a common condition that can lead to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in adulthood. It is usually multifactorial. Screening for cholesterol disorders in children varies based on risk factors, with some guidelines recommending cascade screening for children with a clear family history of familial hypercholesterolemia, targeted screening for those with specific risk factors, and universal screening. Point-of-care testing (POCT) cholesterol tests offer potential advantages, including ease of use, portability, increased patient access, low cost, fewer medical or laboratory visits, and instant results. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of POCT cholesterol screening on the diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia in children in a family practice setting. METHODS: We used a POCT cholesterol analyzer to perform two different (universal and targeted) screening approaches for dyslipidemia in children. We used the NCEP guidelines for the classification of the results. RESULTS: We screened 183 children, 105 in the universal screening group and 78 in the targeted screening group. Eight patients in the targeted screening group had elevated cholesterol levels (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: All participants received instant feedback and recommendations. Using a targeted screening approach, POCT could be a practical and effective tool for identifying at-risk children with hypercholesterolemia.

Are the cut-offs of the rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody different to distinguish rheumatoid arthritis from their primary differential diagnoses?

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) are commonly used for diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although other rheumatic diseases with arthritis can test positive. This study aimed to determine the cutoff values for RF and anti-CCP with the best diagnostic performance in a sample of patients with RA, compared with other rheumatic diseases. METHODS: This was a descriptive, prospective study. EUROINMMUN enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for RF isotypes immunoglobulin (Ig) A (IgA), IgG and IgM and third-generation assay IgG for anti-CCP were used in serum samples of patients with RA, other rheumatic diseases and healthy subjects. The cutoff with the best diagnostic performance was determined by the Youden Index and receiver operating characteristic analysis Results: Three hundred and thirty-two serum samples were analysed. The cutoffs proposed in our population were for RF in RA patients versus other rheumatic diseases, and healthy subjects IgM 135 IU/mL, for each disease, compared with RA, were psoriatic arthritis (Psa) IgA 47.2 IU/mL, clinically suspicious arthralgia (CSA) IgA 39.5 IU/mL, primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) IgM 180.6 IU/mL, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) IgA 42.6 IU/mL, primary fibromyalgia (pFM) IgM 68.6 IU/mL, osteoarthritis (OA) IgM 48 IU/mL, gout IgM 117 IU/mL and healthy IgM 16.3 IU/mL. For anti-CCP, in RA patients versus other rheumatic diseases, and healthy subjects 6.95 IU/mL, for each disease, compared with RA, were Psa 6.8 IU/mL, CSA 9.95 IU/mL, pSS 20.7 IU/mL, SLE 6 IU /mL, pFM 11.8 IU/mL, OA 11.9 IU/mL, gout 5 IU/mL and healthy 5 IU/mL. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the manufacturer's suggested cutoff, the RA versus differential diagnosis cutoffs must be considered.

Impact of obesity and overweight on C-reactive protein concentrations and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: This study aims to assess the association of obesity and CRP concentrations in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and its influence on measures of disease activity. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed using Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, from the time of their inception to November 2021. Observational studies that evaluated the association between CRP concentrations and obesity or overweight in patients with RA were considered eligible. Correlation coefficients were pooled using the inverse variance method, while effect sizes were pre-calculated for adjusted standardized regression coefficients (ß). RESULTS: A total of 10 studies, which comprised 4024 patients, were included in this systematic review. Individually, most studies report a significant association between CRP concentrations and a higher body mass index or other adiposity measures, but the statistical significance was not sustained when pooling their data together. Through the estimates provided in the present review, it is noted that CRP tends to be more elevated in female patients with RA that have a higher BMI. However, this association is not present in men. CONCLUSION: CRP tends to be elevated in female patients with RA that have a higher BMI. Further research is required to assess this possible sex-related difference and to aid shared decision-making in order to avoid over-treatment and increased burden in patients with obesity and RA. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022314580.

Country-level socioeconomic status relates geographical latitude to the onset of RA: a worldwide cross-sectional analysis in the METEOR registry.

OBJECTIVE: Age at rheumatoid arthritis (RA) onset varies by geographical latitude. We have investigated to what extent differences in patient-specific factors and country-level socioeconomic indicators explain this variability. METHODS: Patients with RA from the worldwide METEOR registry were included. Bayesian multilevel structural equation models were used to study the relationship between the absolute value of (hospital) geographical latitude and age at diagnosis (as a proxy for age at RA onset). We examined to what extent this effect is mediated by individual patient characteristics and by country-specific socioeconomic indicators and disentangled whether the observed effects occurred at the patient, hospital, or country levels. RESULTS: We included 37 981 patients from 93 hospitals in 17 geographically widespread countries. Mean age at diagnosis per country ranged from 39 (Iran) to 55 (Netherlands) years. Per degree increase in country latitude (between 9.9° and 55.8°), mean age at diagnosis increased by 0.23 years (95% credibility interval: 0.095 to 0.38) (reflecting >10 years difference in age at RA onset). For hospitals within a country, this latitude effect was negligible. Inclusion of patient-specific factors (eg, gender, anticitrullinated protein antibodies status) in the model augmented the main effect from 0.23 to 0.36 years. Inclusion of country-level socioeconomic indicators (eg, gross domestic product per capita) in the model almost effaced the main effect (from 0.23 to 0.051 (-0.37 to 0.38)). CONCLUSIONS: Patients living closer to the equator get RA at a younger age. This latitude gradient was not explained by individual patient characteristics, but rather by countries' socioeconomic status, providing a direct link between countries' level of welfare and the clinical onset of RA.

Rheumatoid arthritis-associated antibodies in healthy first-degree relatives of RA patients.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects approximately 1.5% of the population worldwide and 0.5-3.3% of the Mexican population. The presence of rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies has been described in populations at risk of RA development, such as first-degree relatives (FDR). Anti-CarP antibodies are present in RA patients (44%), FDR of RA patients (18%) and healthy controls (4.7%). Anti-CarP antibodies have not been described in FDR of the Mexican population. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of Rheumatoid Factors (RF) isotypes, ACPA and anti-CarP antibodies isotypes in FDR of RA patients. An observational, cross-sectional study, in an FDR of RA cohort, was performed. We measured IgA, IgG and IgM isotypes of RF, ACPA and anti-CarP antibodies. A total of 144 FDRs from 99 RA patients were enrolled. The prevalence of anti-CarP antibodies was 2.8% for IgA, 4.2% for IgG, whereas IgM was not detected. The serologic association was for RF/ACPA 4.48%, RF/anti-CarP 2.7%, FR 64.5%, ACPA 1.3%, ACPA/anti-CarP 0.69%, anti-CarP 3.4%, and no RF/ACPA/anti-CarP was observed. We found a low prevalence of anti-CarP antibodies in our cohort of FDR of RA patients, but the prevalence of ACPA and RF were higher than other cohorts previously reported.

Bone erosions by MRI in first-degree relatives of patients with RA: an exploratory study.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: First-degree relatives (FDR) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of RA diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as a useful tool to detect subclinical synovitis and bone abnormalities as predictors of progression to RA. The presence of grade ≥ 2 bone erosions in RA MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) was reported to be RA-specific. We aim to describe the prevalence and characteristics of MRI findings in RA patients and FDR. METHODS: A cross-sectional and exploratory study of 60 individuals was performed in 38 RA patients and 22 FDR with hand arthralgia without clinical arthritis and positive rheumatoid factor or anticitrullinated protein antibodies. All patients underwent an MRI and were evaluated for synovitis, bone erosion, and bone marrow edema. We evaluated second to fifth metacarpophalangeal joints of the dominant hand according to RAMRIS. RESULTS: Among the total population, eighteen (30%) subjects had grade ≥ 2 bone erosions, and 42 (70%) had at least one erosion of any grade. In patients with grade ≥ 2 bone erosions, 12 (31.6%) were from RA patients and 6 (27.2%) from FDR (p = 0.72). In patients with erosions of any grade, 26 (68.4%) were from RA patients and 15 (68.2%) were from FDR (p = 0.98). CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of bone erosions was found in RA patients' FDR who had symptoms without clinical arthritis and positive serology. MRI might be helpful in this population for an early detection of RA-specific erosions. The prognosis and the treatment decisions in these subjects should be elucidated. KEY POINTS: • First-degree relatives (FDR) of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with positive serology and joint symptoms constitute a select subpopulation of individuals with an increased risk of developing RA. • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of FDR shows a high prevalence of bone erosions of any grade, grade ≥ 2 erosions, and synovitis. • MRI might be helpful in FDR of RA patients to screen for the presence of RA-specific erosions or clinically undetectable synovitis.

Anti-carbamylated protein antibodies positivity and disease activity in Hispanic patients with established rheumatoid arthritis: An observational study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the prevalence of anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies in Mexican Hispanics with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to assess their relationship with disease activity. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted in 278 patients with established RA during an 18-month follow-up. We measured IgG/IgM/IgA rheumatoid factor (RF), IgG anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and IgG/IgM/IgA anti-CarP antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). For disease activity, we performed the 28-joint disease activity score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). Repeated measures one-way ANOVA was used to test the association between anti-CarP IgG antibody status and longitudinal DAS28-ESR scores. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months during follow-up. RESULTS: Anti-CarP IgG antibodies were positive in 47.8% of patients and, accounting for all isotypes, in 9.5% of patients with negative RF and ACPA. Triple antibody positivity was present in 42.6% of patients in our sample. Anti-CarP IgG antibody positivity did not show statistically significant differences in mean DAS28-ESR when compared to anti-CarP IgG antibody negative patients at baseline, 6, 12 or 18 months. CONCLUSION: Anti-CarP IgG antibodies are not associated to a higher disease activity in Hispanic patients with established RA. Our findings suggest that the clinical value of measuring anti-CarP antibodies in RA diminishes over time.

Evolution of clinical, histological and serological features in a Primary Sjὄgren´s Syndrome cohort and the limitations of the current classification criteria.

OBJECTIVE: The classification and/or diagnosis of Primary Sjögren's Syndrome (PSS) requires a multidimensional approach. Although age and the duration of sicca symptoms can affect the clinical, serological and histological features found at initial evaluation, these are not considered when using classification criteria as a guide for PSS diagnosis. Our study aimed to explore if there is any relationship between the duration of symptoms and clinical, histopathological and serological findings. METHODS: An observational, retrospective study was performed. All the evaluated subjects were part of the "sicca cohort". Patients' clinical, serological and histological characteristics were assessed according to the duration of symptoms. A Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to establish the duration of symptoms (months) that predicted a PSS diagnosis. Binary regression models and odds ratios were used to evaluate the association between the duration of symptoms and the clinical, serological, and histopathological profiles. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen patients were included; 97(83.62%) fulfilled PSS criteria. Of the 116 patients, thirty-six (31.03%) had < 15 months presenting with sicca symptoms when receiving a diagnostic approach. A duration of symptoms >15 months was associated with an altered Schirmer test (OR 2.76; 95% CI 1.15-6.61, P=0.02), low salivary flow rate (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.34-9.13, P=0.01), ≥1 foci score (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1-1.45, P=0.04), ocular (OR 7.8; 95% CI 1.49-40.81, P=0.02) and severe oral symptoms (OR 2.61; 95% CI 1.16-5.87, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: The time of evolution of symptoms plays a fundamental role in the clinical, histological and serological profiles in PSS.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the elderly. Agreement with safe prescription recommendations according to cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs are the cornerstone in the treatment of acute and chronic pain due to inflammation in musculoskeletal conditions. Even though adverse side-effects are associated, their use is common in the elderly patients. Our aim is to determine the prescription trend of NSAIDs, the evaluation for gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) risks, and the level of agreement with prescription guidelines. METHODS: We conducted an observation and descriptive study in a general hospital geriatrics consultation. RESULTS: From the 231 patients only 59 patients had a NSAIDs prescription. The most frequently prescribed was Acetaminophen, in 29(49.1%) patients, Celecoxib was prescribed in 11(18.6%) patients, Piroxicam in 5(8.4%) patients, Acetaminophen plus Celecoxib plus Omeprazole in 4 (6.7%), Acetaminophen plus Piroxicam in 2 (0.3%) patients, and Acetaminophen plus Diclofenac plus Celecoxib in 1 patient (1.6%). In the Framingham risk classification there were 160/231 (69.3%) patients in Very High Risk and 71/231 (30.7%) patients in High Risk. There were no patients in Low Risk. GI Risk: 79 patients (34.1%) had a peptic ulcer disease history. There were 55/231 (23.8%) in the High GI Risk classification, 102/231 (44.1%) in Intermediate GI Risk and 74/231 (32%) in the Low Risk. The level of agreement between the prescribed versus recommended NSAIDs according the CV and GI risks was measured with a contingence table and the kappa statistic of 0.37 p=0.001. CONCLUSION: There is a low level of agreement between prescribed and recommended NSAID in elderly population.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the elderly. Agreement with safe prescription recommendations according to cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks / Medicamentos antiinflamatorios no esteroideos en ancianos. Concordancia con las guías de prescripción segura con respecto a los riesgos cardiovasculares y gastrointestinales

Introduction/objective: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs are the cornerstone in the treatment of acute and chronic pain due to inflammation in musculoskeletal conditions. Even though adverse side-effects are associated, their use is common in the elderly patients. Our aim is to determine the prescription trend of NSAIDs, the evaluation for gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) risks, and the level of agreement with prescription guidelines. Methods: We conducted an observation and descriptive study in a general hospital geriatrics consultation. Results: From the 231 patients only 59 patients had a NSAIDs prescription. The most frequently prescribed was Acetaminophen, in 29(49.1%) patients, Celecoxib was prescribed in 11(18.6%) patients, Piroxicam in 5(8.4%) patients, Acetaminophen plus Celecoxib plus Omeprazole in 4 (6.7%), Acetaminophen plus Piroxicam in 2 (0.3%) patients, and Acetaminophen plus Diclofenac plus Celecoxib in 1 patient (1.6%). In the Framingham risk classification there were 160/231 (69.3%) patients in Very High Risk and 71/231 (30.7%) patients in High Risk. There were no patients in Low Risk. GI Risk: 79 patients (34.1%) had a peptic ulcer disease history. There were 55/231 (23.8%) in the High GI Risk classification, 102/231 (44.1%) in Intermediate GI Risk and 74/231 (32%) in the Low Risk. The level of agreement between the prescribed versus recommended NSAIDs according the CV and GI risks was measured with a contingence table and the kappa statistic of 0.37 p=0.001. Conclusion: There is a low level of agreement between prescribed and recommended NSAID in elderly population.(AU)

Introducción/objetivo: Los medicamentos antiinflamatorios no esteroideos son la piedra angular en el tratamiento del dolor agudo y crónico debido a la inflamación en las afecciones musculoesqueléticas. Aunque los efectos secundarios adversos están asociados, su uso es común en pacientes de edad avanzada. Nuestro objetivo es determinar la tendencia de prescripción de los AINE, la evaluación de riesgos gastrointestinales (GI) y cardiovasculares (CV), y el nivel de acuerdo con las pautas de prescripción. Métodos:Realizamos un estudio descriptivo y de observación en una consulta de geriatría de un hospital general. Resultados: De los 231 pacientes, solo 59 pacientes tenían una prescripción de AINE. El más frecuentemente recetado fue acetaminofeno, en 29 (49,1%) pacientes, celecoxib se prescribió en 11 (18,6%) pacientes, piroxicam en 5 (8,4%) pacientes, acetaminofeno más celecoxib más omeprazole en 4 (6,7%), acetaminofeno más piroxicam en 2 (0,3%) pacientes, y acetaminofeno más diclofenaco más celecoxib en un paciente (1,6%). En la clasificación de riesgo de Framingham había 160/231 (69,3%) pacientes en muy alto riesgo y 71/231 (30,7%) pacientes en alto riesgo. No hubo pacientes en bajo riesgo. Riesgo gastrointestinal: 79 pacientes (34,1%) tenían antecedentes de enfermedad de úlcera péptica. Hubo 55/231 (23,8%) en la clasificación de riesgo GI alto, 102/231 (44,1%) en riesgo GI intermedio y 74/231 (32%) en riesgo bajo. El nivel de acuerdo entre los AINE prescritos versus los recomendados según los riesgos CV y GI se midió con una tabla de contingencia y el estadístico kappa de 0,37 p=0,001. Conclusión: Existe un bajo nivel de acuerdo entre los AINE prescritos y recomendados en la población de edad avanzada.(AU)

Comorbidity burden in terms of disability in patients with osteoarthritis in Mexico. The IMPACTAR registry.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the comorbidities associated with disability in patients with OA in Mexico (2013-2015). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective and multicentre IMPACTAR study (n=7703) in Mexican patients (2013-2015). Comorbidities associated with disability were identified in 4971 patients diagnosed with OA from the IMPACTAR registry (n=7073). An adjusted logistic regression analysis was carried out by demographic, economic, clinical and medical variables. RESULTS: Mean age was 63 years; and 75% of the patients were women. Subjects with OA and presence of comorbidities are 42% more likely to develop disabilities than patients without associated comorbidity, considering age, sex, family income, OA diagnosis duration, and education level. The highest rate of people with disability (28.9%) was concentrated in Region 7, which corresponds to Mexico City. There are also significant differences between median family incomes, when the income of persons with disability is under $13 000 (IQR: 9000-16 000) Mexican pesos, compared to patients without disability. Almost half of the subjects (49.6%) reported having at least one comorbidity. Arterial hypertension was the risk factor with a statistically significant difference (32.8%) among those with disability (34.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Programs and interventions for OA patients should take into consideration comorbidity factors, being female, family income, and the region of residence as variables that may increase the possibility of developing an OA-associated disability.

Comorbidity burden in terms of disability in patients with osteoarthritis in Mexico. The IMPACTAR registry / Carga de comorbilidad en términos de discapacidad en pacientes con osteoartritis en México. El registro IMPACTAR

Objective. To determine the comorbidities associated with disability in patients with OA in Mexico (2013–2015). Material and methods: A cross-sectional, retrospective and multicentre IMPACTAR study (n=7703) in Mexican patients (2013–2015). Comorbidities associated with disability were identified in 4971 patients diagnosed with OA from the IMPACTAR registry (n=7073). An adjusted logistic regression analysis was carried out by demographic, economic, clinical and medical variables. Results: Mean age was 63 years; and 75% of the patients were women. Subjects with OA and presence of comorbidities are 42% more likely to develop disabilities than patients without associated comorbidity, considering age, sex, family income, OA diagnosis duration, and education level. The highest rate of people with disability (28.9%) was concentrated in Region 7, which corresponds to Mexico City. There are also significant differences between median family incomes, when the income of persons with disability is under $13 000 (IQR: 9000–16 000) Mexican pesos, compared to patients without disability. Almost half of the subjects (49.6%) reported having at least one comorbidity. Arterial hypertension was the risk factor with a statistically significant difference (32.8%) among those with disability (34.7%). Conclusions: Programs and interventions for OA patients should take into consideration comorbidity factors, being female, family income, and the region of residence as variables that may increase the possibility of developing an OA-associated disability.(AU)

Objetivo: Determinar las comorbilidades asociadas a la incapacidad en pacientes con osteoartritis (OA) en México (2013-2015). Material y métodos: Estudio IMPACTAR transversal, retrospectivo y multicéntrico (n=7.703) en pacientes mejicanos (2013-2015). Se identificaron las comorbilidades asociadas a la incapacidad en 4.971 pacientes diagnosticados de OA en el registro IMPACTAR (n=7.073). Se realizó un análisis de regresión logística ajustada por variables demográfica, económica, clínica y médica. Resultados: La edad media fue de 63 años, y el 75% de los pacientes eran mujeres. Los sujetos con OA y la presencia de comorbilidades tienen un 42% mayor de probabilidad de desarrollar incapacidades que los pacientes sin comorbilidad asociada, considerando la edad, el sexo familia, los ingresos, la duración del diagnóstico de OA y el nivel educativo. La tasa poblacional con mayor tasa de incapacidad (28,9%) se concentró en la Región 7, que corresponde a Ciudad de México. También existieron diferencias significativas entre los ingresos familiares medios, cuando la renta de las personas con incapacidad se sitúa por debajo de los 13.000$ (RIC: 9.000-16.000) pesos mejicanos, en comparación con los pacientes sin incapacidad. Casi la mitad de los sujetos (49,6%) reportaron tener al menos una comorbilidad. La hipertensión arterial fue el factor de riesgo con diferencia estadísticamente significativa (32,8%) entre aquellas personas con incapacidad (34,7%). Conclusiones: Los programas e intervenciones para pacientes con OA deberían considerar los factores de comorbilidad tales como sexo femenino, ingresos familiares y región de residencia como variables que podrían incrementar la posibilidad de desarrollar una incapacidad asociada a OA.(AU)

Efficacy and safety of weekly vitamin D3 in patients with fibromyalgia: 12-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled placebo trial.

INTRODUCTION: FM is a chronic musculoskeletal disorder characterized by the presence of generalized pain. There are contradictory results regarding the prevalence and supplementation effect of vitamin D deficiency on FM patients. We aim to determine the safety and efficacy of a 12-week vitamin D supplementation on FM patients. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. We included female participants of 18 years old or older, who met 1990 or 2010 ACR criteria for fibromyalgia. The Spanish validated FIQ and the VAS of pain were applied at baseline. The participants were then randomized to receive placebo or 50,000 IU of Vitamin D3 PO, weekly for 12 weeks. RESULTS: We included 80 patients. There was no statistical difference in the initial and final FIQ between both groups. The FIQ delta also did not prove to be different at the end of the study. The increase in vitamin D levels in the intervention group was corroborated. Regarding serious adverse effects, none was reported in both groups. There was no statistical difference in minor adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study conducted to measure the efficacy and safety of vitamin D exclusively in patients with FM, we found that there is no evidence of a trend in favor of vitamin D treatment, since we did not observe improvement in the VAS of pain or FIQ. TRIAL REGISTRY: Clinical Trials.gov number: NCT03369379 Key Points • There are conflicting results in vitamin D to treat fibromyalgia. • In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we did not find a difference in the VAS nor FIQ with vitamin D supplementation. • The increase in vitamin D levels in the intervention group was corroborated.

Phenotype and treatment of elderly onset compared with younger onset rheumatoid arthritis patients in international daily practice.

OBJECTIVE: To identify possible differences in baseline characteristics, initial treatment and treatment response between RA patient subgroups based on age at disease onset. METHODS: Daily practice data from the worldwide METEOR registry were used. Patients (7912) were stratified into three age-groups (age at disease diagnosis <45 years, 45-65 years, >65 years). Initial treatment was compared between the different age-groups. With Cox regression analyses the effect of age-group on time-to-switch from first to second treatment was investigated, and with linear mixed models differences in response to treatment (DAS and HAQ) between the age-groups were assessed, after correction for potential confounders. RESULTS: The >65 years age-group included more men, and more seronegative RA with somewhat higher inflammatory markers. Initial treatment choices differed only slightly between the age-groups, and the time-to-switch from initial treatment to the next was similar. DAS and HAQ improvement were dependent on the age-group, reflected by a significant interaction between age-group and outcome. The stratified analysis showed a difference of -0.02 and -0.05 DAS points and, -0.01 and 0.02 HAQ points per month in the <45 and 45-65 years age-groups as compared with the >65 year age group, a difference that did not seem clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: In this international study on worldwide clinical practice, patients with RA onset >65 years include more men and seronegative arthritis, and were initially treated slightly differently than younger patients. We observed no clinically relevant differences in timing of a next treatment step, or response to treatment measured by DAS and HAQ.

Role of rheumatoid factor isotypes and anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies in the differential diagnosis of non-selected patients with inflammatory arthralgia / Rol de los isotipos del factor reumatoide y los anticuerpos anti-péptido cíclico citrulinado en el diagnóstico diferencial de pacientes no seleccionados con artralgia inflamatoria

Background/ObjectivesRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by swelling, tenderness and destruction of synovial joints, leading to severe disability and premature mortality. The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the 3 isotypes of rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) and the combination of both, for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in non-selected patients with inflammatory arthralgia.MethodsWe include 129 patients with inflammatory Arthalgia from a third level reference Center of rheumatic diseases in Monterrey, México. Their samples were analyzed for RF isotypes (IgA, IgG, and IgM) by ELISA (EUROINMUN), using a cut-off of 20IU/ml, and for ACPA's 5IU/ml; a medical examination was performed to obtain the definitive diagnoses of the patients. Data analysis was carried out using ROC curves for the measurement of sensitivity, specificity, for diagnostic accuracy to verify if the use of 3 RF isotypes and ACPA had a better prediction for the diagnosis of RA than use only one isotype and the ACPA alone.ResultsThe ROC showed a sensitivity and specificity of the different antibodies with different cut-off points, being the best for the IgM with 0.802 followed by ACPA, IgA and IgG with 0.771, 0.63, and 0.728 respectively without statistical difference, the sensitivity and specificity of the combination of the 4 antibodies were 81.4 and 73.66%.ConclusionIn non-selected patients with inflammatory arthralgia, the combination of ACPA and isotypes of RF did not demonstrate more sensibility and specificity than IgM isoform of rheumatoid factor measurement only. We recommend that in the clinical scenario of arthralgia, where the diagnoses are Lupus, Sjogren syndrome and Osteoarthritis, RF IgM isoform is used followed by ACPA.(AU)

Introduccion/objetivosLa artrtitis reumatoide (AR) es una enfermedad inflamatoria crónica caracterizada por inflamación, sensibilidad y destrucción de la membrana sinovial de las articulaciones, dando lugar a una discapacidad grave y mortalidad prematura. El objetivo del estudio fue determinar la precisión diagnóstica de los 3 isotipos del factor reumatoide (RF), los anticuerpos peptídicos anti citrulinados (ACPA) y la combinación de ambos, para el diagnóstico de AR en pacientes no seleccionados con artralgia inflamatoria.MétodosFueron incluidos 129 pacientes con artralgia inflamatoria de un centro de referencia de enfermedades reumáticas de tercer nivel en Monterrey, México. Sus muestras se analizaron para determinar los isotipos de RF (IgA, IgG e IgM) mediante ELISA (Euroinmun), usando un límite de 20UI/ml, y de 5UI/ml de ACPA. Se realizó un examen médico para obtener los diagnósticos definitivos de los pacientes. El análisis de los datos se realizó mediante las curvas ROC para la medición de la sensibilidad, la especificidad y la precisión diagnóstica para verificar si el uso de 3 isotipos de RF y ACPA tenía una mejor predicción para el diagnóstico de la AR que el uso de un solo isotipo y el ACPA solo.ResultadosLa curva ROC mostró una sensibilidad y especificidad de los diferentes anticuerpos con diferentes puntos de corte, siendo el mejor para el IgM con 0,802 seguido de ACPA, IgA e IgG con 0,771, 0,63 y 0,728, respectivamente, sin diferencia estadística; la sensibilidad y la especificidad de la combinación de los 4 anticuerpos fueron 81,4 y 73,66%.ConclusiónEn pacientes no seleccionados con artralgia inflamatoria, la combinación de ACPA e isotipos de RF no demostró más sensibilidad y especificidad que la isoforma IgM de la medición del RF solamente. Recomendamos que, en el escenario clínico de artralgia, donde los diagnósticos son lupus, síndrome de Sjögren y osteoartritis, se use la isoforma RF IgM seguida de los ACPA.(AU)